<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jquery Tools: A Jquery UI Alternative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devirtuoso.com/2009/06/jquery-tools-a-jquery-ui-alternative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devirtuoso.com/2009/06/jquery-tools-a-jquery-ui-alternative/</link>
	<description>Web Development Wickedness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:53:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar Godson</title>
		<link>http://www.devirtuoso.com/2009/06/jquery-tools-a-jquery-ui-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar Godson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devirtuoso.com/?p=450#comment-191</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-155&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@ZK@Web Marketing Blog&lt;/a&gt; 

Not true at all. Like &quot;admin&quot; said, it&#039;s cached in your browser so, even if Google slows down it won&#039;t slow down the download time because it isn&#039;t downloaded. For example:

Site A: Hosts from Google
Site B: Hosts from Google
Site C: Has their own version
Site D: Hosts from Google

When you get to site C you have to redownload it, but once you go to Site D it&#039;s cached from A, so download time will be the same as site B. Even if when you get to B or D if Google slowed down you wouldn&#039;t even notice it.

Also, C&#039;mon, what&#039;s the chance of Google shutting down? You honestly have a better chance of your own site being, hacked, shut off, lose power, fire (like Dotster), and other stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-155" rel="nofollow">@ZK@Web Marketing Blog</a> </p>
<p>Not true at all. Like &#8220;admin&#8221; said, it&#8217;s cached in your browser so, even if Google slows down it won&#8217;t slow down the download time because it isn&#8217;t downloaded. For example:</p>
<p>Site A: Hosts from Google<br />
Site B: Hosts from Google<br />
Site C: Has their own version<br />
Site D: Hosts from Google</p>
<p>When you get to site C you have to redownload it, but once you go to Site D it&#8217;s cached from A, so download time will be the same as site B. Even if when you get to B or D if Google slowed down you wouldn&#8217;t even notice it.</p>
<p>Also, C&#8217;mon, what&#8217;s the chance of Google shutting down? You honestly have a better chance of your own site being, hacked, shut off, lose power, fire (like Dotster), and other stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.devirtuoso.com/2009/06/jquery-tools-a-jquery-ui-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devirtuoso.com/?p=450#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Not necessarily.  Because it such a common include odds are your browser will already have it cached from a different site, so the user won&#039;t have to download it all, hows that for speed ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not necessarily.  Because it such a common include odds are your browser will already have it cached from a different site, so the user won&#8217;t have to download it all, hows that for speed <img src='http://www.devirtuoso.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZK@Web Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.devirtuoso.com/2009/06/jquery-tools-a-jquery-ui-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>ZK@Web Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devirtuoso.com/?p=450#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Google hosting your jQuery is a 100% bad idea. It is like parking your car at your friends parking lot a few blocks away.
Google occasionally has slowdowns. I have no need for an additional critical point of failure for my websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google hosting your jQuery is a 100% bad idea. It is like parking your car at your friends parking lot a few blocks away.<br />
Google occasionally has slowdowns. I have no need for an additional critical point of failure for my websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.devirtuoso.com/2009/06/jquery-tools-a-jquery-ui-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devirtuoso.com/?p=450#comment-100</guid>
		<description>JQuery Tools? It is the first time I hear this. Maybe I have to spend some time on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JQuery Tools? It is the first time I hear this. Maybe I have to spend some time on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kindle DX review &#124; wireless reading device</title>
		<link>http://www.devirtuoso.com/2009/06/jquery-tools-a-jquery-ui-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Kindle DX review &#124; wireless reading device</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 01:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devirtuoso.com/?p=450#comment-56</guid>
		<description>[...] Jquery Tools: A Jquery UI Alternative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jquery Tools: A Jquery UI Alternative [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.devirtuoso.com @ 2012-02-10 11:41:48 -->
